I didn’t realize there was so much bad sex out there until I started reviewing books in the mid-1990s for the Detroit Free Press where my portfolio included literary, commercial, and crime fiction. Though there’s an annual prize given in England to bad sex writing—The Literary Review Bad Sex in Fiction Award—I hadn’t previously paid much attention to the problem. But as books sent by the book editor arrived at my door by the box-load, I began to realize that a lot of writers, even good ones, were sexually inadequate. On the page, that is.
Time after time I’d find myself reading an involving story of one kind or another and suddenly there would be a sex scene that made me wince because it was clumsy, improbable, or even grotesque. I was surprised and disappointed that writers I admired and enjoyed seemed to fall apart when it came to writing sex scenes. Whether it was lack of practice in this particular aspect of their craft, or embarrassment, or even being too turned on to have enough objectivity, I couldn’t say.
But I did start to notice two major trends in bad sex writing and I still see these problems cropping up across the fiction board: problems with timing, and de-personalization.
Many authors don’t seem to understand that timing is just as important in fictional sex as in real sex. If a sex scene is introduced, where does it fit in the arc of the story? Does it move the plot along, or does it slow it down? Does it add depth to the characters and story or is it distracting? Not enough authors ask themselves when’s the best place for a sex scene or even if it’s organic to the work.
I goofed in an early version of my novel The German Money by introducing a sex scene early in chapter one. I thought it illuminated the inner state of my narrator, but a writer friend thankfully pointed out that it would distract readers from the character’s dark musings about his very dysfunctional family. As soon as she said it, I knew she was right, so I moved the scene several chapters along and used it as a short flashback. It worked there just fine and the book got a rave review in the Washington Post. The reviewer compared me to John le Carré, Kafka, and Philip Roth.
A more serious problem than timing and appropriateness in sex scenes is that two people who've been fully individualized characters before the scene fade away and become little more than a jumble of primary or secondary sex characteristics. We end up reading about parts having sex, rather than people. And the geography can sometimes get confusing. I actually enjoyed reading Fifty Shades of Grey because it offered so many lessons in how not to write. I even used one sex scene in a writing workshop where an attendee justly noted, "It reads like one of those Picasso paintings where everything's all jumbled up."
Some writers seem so determined to be un-puritanical when they write a sex scene that they forget they’re writing about human beings who have feelings aside from lust or passion. Sex means something more than just itself, or at least it can be something more than just itself. And if it’s casual or even what some people might call “meaningless” sex, then that should be clear in the scene, however it’s narrated.
As my first editor at St. Martin's Press said: "Sex reveals who people are in unique ways--it's crucial for authors to get it right, to make it real without making it porn."
(Image by Robin Higgins from Pixabay)
Lev Raphael is the author of 27 books in genres from memoir to mystery and one of them has sold 300,000 copies. He coaches, edits, and mentors writers at https://writewithoutborders.com
My beta reader is my spouse who is an author in a different field and terrific copy editor too. And full of plot twists for my mysteries.
It very much can be done well. Example: the sex in Mary Gordon's novel Spending. Or the sex in Joseph Kanon's novel Alibi.